--- G G <gsquared100@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From G G Sat Aug 21 11:09:17 1999
> Received: from [] by
> web501.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:09:17 PDT
> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
> From: G G <gsquared100@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: My Position
> To: Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Length: 7146
> 
> Patricia-
> 
> If you tell me which parts you want me to send to
> Mike
> Tracey, I will do that, but I cannot give you his
> email address without his permission. I gave it Jeff
> Shapiro thinking that Mike wouldn't mind but he did
> mind, so I have to be careful about that.
> 
> You are correct regarding your email routes. I know
> a
> little bit about the technology. Basically, your
> emails are sent through various servers and routers
> in
> packets. Imagine that when you send an email, each
> word takes a different route. All of the internet is
> like this. Messages are broken up into little
> packets
> and sent via a system of routers and switches to
> their
> final destination, which is someone's personal
> computer (PC). A normal message is broken up and
> then
> put togehter again at the end, and a trace route can
> be done on an IP address that will lead back to the
> place you dialed into. For example, when I log on,
> my
> phone dials into the ATT Internet backbone. Say I
> threatened someone on line - if they filed a
> complaint
> with the police, they would go to ATT with a
> subpeaona
> to get the phone number I dialed from. That's  how
> they would know it was me. In your case, your
> message
> is broken up and sent through many many more routers
> and servers than would ordinarily be the case. The
> packets are bounced back and forth and all around so
> many times that it becomes almost impossible to
> unscramble them. Even a sophisticated computer
> system
> would take years to do it. However, the service you
> go
> through to anonymize yourself (for lack of a better
> word) knows who you are. 
> 
> I understand your desire to protect your family. I
> would do the same. What message do you want me to
> relay, and to whom?
> 
> Can you tell me who is helping you to send emails? 
> 
> This man you speak of - how old is he? How did he
> get
> to Boulder with no one knowing and how did he get
> out
> again? Did JonBenet know him too? Does your husband
> share your suspicions?
> 
> G
> 
> 
>  --- Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net> wrote:
> > Dear Gail,
> > 
> > I am in a very bad position. I will try to explain
> > it to you. You 
> > will find that I have no desire to force anyone to
> > believe I am 
> > Patricia Ramsey. I only want to find a way to have
> > my words 
> > heard. I feel that I am the only person who can
> > effectively 
> > appeal to my daughter's killer. Let me try to
> > explain my 
> > position.
> > 
> > In the first place, my attorneys have no
> intentions
> > of letting me 
> > talk to anyone, in the press or otherwise, while
> the
> > grand jury 
> > is supposedly in its final phases. Every word I
> > could say would 
> > be scrutinized and analyzed - all for the purpose
> of
> > slanting 
> > things toward my guilt.
> > 
> > I must also respect the feelings of my family. I
> > know that I 
> > should reveal certain truths, but I refuse to do
> > anything that 
> > would offend my family in any way. My mere
> presence
> > here has 
> > already prompted people to contact them directly.
> I
> > do not want 
> > this to happen. I know their answer - "Patricia
> does
> > not own a 
> > computer; furthermore, she would not refer to
> > herself as 
> > "Patricia" as she is called by all who love her -
> > Patsy." This is 
> > where I really anger those who refer such findings
> > to me by 
> > responding, "That is correct. I do not own a
> > computer and would 
> > never refer to myself as Patricia". 
> > 
> > While the above might seem terribly confusing; to
> > me, it all 
> > makes perfect sense when the final element is put
> > into place - I 
> > fear my daughter's killer. If I come forth and
> turn
> > the direction 
> > of this investigation toward him, he might
> retaliate
> > against my 
> > family. He warned us of such retaliation in his
> > ransom note. 
> > Would not any mom deny anything and keep secrets
> as
> > long as she 
> > must keep them, in order to protect her family?
> This
> > same person 
> > has already taken one of my children. What act
> could
> > be more 
> > aggressive? He is capable of anything.
> > 
> > As you talk to me, you will understand the
> > frustration people 
> > have with me. I will admit that I am not doing
> this
> > alone. I do 
> > have assistance. I have confided in at least 3
> > people who seem to 
> > have my best interest at heart. I could not carry
> > this out alone. 
> > I have no knowledge of the complexities of the
> very
> > vehicle that 
> > brings these messages to you. According to my
> > contacts, the 
> > receiving end of this mail is scrambled up to the
> > point that they 
> > are opened and scrambled up until the point it
> > leaves. All this 
> > requires some highly technical applications that I
> > could never 
> > understand.
> > 
> > If you think you can survive my illusiveness;
> > something I feel is 
> > imperative though it is destroying any chance of
> my
> > being heard, 
> > then I would like to talk to you. Yes, I would
> like
> > for Michael 
> > to see some things I say to you. Will you let me
> > tell you things 
> > I want you to send to him? I will tell you that,
> so
> > far, I have 
> > only spoken directly to such people as Michael. I
> > would like to 
> > continue that. It would be nice to send these
> > messages directly 
> > to an e-mail address Michael might maintain.
> > 
> > The man I speak of, who might very well be a
> killer,
> > is a person 
> > I am currently in contact with. You must not share
> > that with 
> > another living soul unless I ask you to do so.
> > Collins is making 
> > a fool of himself; moreover, of me. I do not want
> > any further 
> > leaks. By the way, I never said that much to
> Collins
> > about this 
> > man I speak about to you. 
> > 
> > The man I speak of frequents my daughter's grave.
> A
> > few days ago, 
> > he confirmed his visits by describing specific
> > physical 
> > surroundings. He made comments like "A rose for
> > JonBenet; A rose 
> > for Beth." He also said he liked the new ornaments
> > in the 
> > dogwood, describing the dove directly above her
> > grave as his 
> > favorite. He went on to describe the long stem
> > flowers that drape 
> > her grave horizontally this week. Gail, all those
> > physical 
> > descriptions are currently present. He is not
> lying
> > when he says 
> > he has been spending a lot of time with JonBenet. 
> > 
> > Let me add, importantly, that he is a very kind
> and
> > sweet person. 
> > He is unbelievably kind to me and expresses his
> > undying love for 
> > JonBenet. I have never made comment to him that he
> > might be the 
> > killer. I am concerned because he has described
> her
> > murder with 
> > such fluency. He seems to know a little too much.
> > Otherwise, he 
> > is a Prince.
> > 
> > Thank you for talking to me about this matter. I
> > would not be 
> > telling you this if I did not think you were to be
> > trusted. I 
> > also feel that you might relay a very important
> > message that I 
> > have tried for months to relay. I request that you
> > not go to the 
> > police. This must be done delicately. My
> mysterious
> > friend will 
> > fly if he has any thought that the authorities are
> > involved. 
> > After having spoken to me, re-read the warnings in
> > the ransom 
> > note. I must not take any chances. Drawing out the
> > killer is 
> > important to me; however, preventing any harm to
> one
> > of my family 
> > members is my priority.
> > 
> > Patricia
> >